Thursday, July 31, 2008

Ethanol

Continuing my series on fuels other than the regular gasoline we pump into our cars is this look at ethanol.

So what is ethanol?
It is the same type of alcohol as in alcoholic beverages, but it also can be burned as fuel. It's molecular formula is written as C2H5OH or CH3-CH2-OH.

Was Henry Ford right when he called alcohol the "fuel of the future"? http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol.html

This how stuff works site describes the step by step process of how it's made.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/ethanol-facts.htm

Ethanol is one of the more attractive alternatives to gasoline simply because we can use it now - if you have a car that can use it and live near E85 stations.

It is not a new technology. Brazil started using ethanol, made from sugarcane, for fuel in the 1970s. "Today more than two-thirds of all cars sold run on ethanol and all Brazilian gasoline sold at the pumps contains 25 percent ethanol." from http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0505/p04s01-woam.html

Many Brazilians drive flex fuel vehicles than can run on gasoline or ethanol. When they fill up the tank, they have a choice, and most choose the home grown, less expensive ethanol. That sounds pretty nice.

Some people argue that using these food plants for fuel will mean there won't be enough food. Well, Brazil has an overproduction of sugar just like we have an overproduction of corn (much of that corn is not edible anyway). There are also some useful by products from making ethanol, such as CO2 which is sold for use in carbonated beverages or dry ice or maybe use in paintball guns. The left over plant proteins are fed to livestock, which is making use of a byproduct but not that great for the cows. Also, who says you have to make ethanol from food?

Ethanol can be made from cellulose. Range Fuels in Georgia was granted a permit to create the first cellulosic ethanol plant in America in July 2007. Cellulosic ethanol is pretty cool because not only are you using all of the plant, but its way more energy efficient than just using the sugar parts of the plant.

"Cellulosic ethanol can contain up to 16 times more energy than is required to create it! If that doesn't sound ridiculously impressive, consider that gasoline contains only 5 times more energy than was required to create it and corn ethanol is totally lame, containing only 1.3 times the energy required to create it." http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/798/
I'm not sure when this year, but they plan on making 100 million gallons of ethanol per year starting sometime in 2008.

So, summing up, here are some of the benefits of ethanol:
  • It is a cost effective alternative to gasoline.
  • It is a renewable energy source - from plants.
  • It provides high octane at a low cost.
  • Ethanol blends can and are being used without modifications to car engines - most gas you buy now is 10% ethanol.
  • Ethanol's high oxygen content reduces carbon monoxide emissions, and its the carbon monoxide (CO) that is the really deadly stuff.
  • If you care about CO2 emissions - ethanol reduces that too.
One downside is that you'll get a little less miles per gallon, but with the price difference between ethanol and gasoline, it's still worth it.

Much Ado About Nothing

In my internet browsing I found this article.

http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/largest-cleantech-industry-is%e2%80%a6carbon-credits-at-63-billion/

"Carbon credits were worth a staggering $63 billion in 2007 and $59 billion in the first half of 2008 alone." (Sarah Lozanova)


Carbon credits are a bigger industry than either solar or wind power. There is something wrong with this picture. How can the biggest clean technology not actually be a technology!?

Now I'm for reducing pollution, but I don't know how many times I need to say this. Carbon dioxide is not pollution. To all those who think it is, remember this: when you breath, you make carbon dioxide.

I just don't understand why people would buy carbon credits. Is it because they feel bad about making carbon dioxide? Where does that $63 billion go?

Why are they called carbon credits instead of carbon dioxide credits? If anyone has chunks of carbon just sitting around that they feel bad about, I would be happy to take them off your hand for a small "carbon credit" fee. I'm sure I could find a use for all that coal and diamonds.

Maybe I should make up a problem and charge people money for it. Anyone want to buy some Nitrogen credits? Everyday, you are breathing in and out way more nitrogen than carbon dioxide! If you think the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is alarming, than you should be even more alarmed at the amount of Nitrogen.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Congress and Bush Ignore the Constitution

There wasn't much press about this. I heard about it at the last minute.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_go_co/terrorist_surveillance

Retroactive immunity was given to telecom companies today, ignoring the fourth amendment of the constitution. Congress and the President all take an oath to uphold the constitution. The fact that they are passing laws that blatantly go against it makes me sick!


Here is the 4th Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


So, to spy on someone, you need a warrant and probable cause, and you need to describe the person or place you want to search.

The old FISA law gave the FBI a lot of leeway and made those warrants really easy to get. This new law goes way beyond that.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/washington/10fisa.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Obama voted for this mess! What happened to the plan to filibuster? http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/blogtalk-obamas-fisa-vote/

McCain was out of town and didn't bother to vote.


See the rest of the Bill of Rights here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

A Note About Speculation

If you define a bubble as a faster than exponential increase in price, then we have an oil price bubble right now.


http://www.physorg.com/news134646313.html