Sunday, October 5, 2008

The Financial Mess

If you've been following the news at all you know about the housing prices declining and banks and investment firms going bankrupt, and the government bailout that Congress just passed.

This whole mess disgusts me. The people responsible need to be prosecuted, but it sounds like many will get off easy.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100203631.html?hpid=topnews


We, the people, need to hold our representatives accountable for mishandling the whole mess.

Here is more information about H.R.1424: A bill to provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure certain types of troubled assets for the purposes of providing stability to and preventing disruption in the economy and financial system and protecting taxpayers, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes. (This is the one passed by Congress and signed by the president.)
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1424
You can find the full text here: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-1424
This gives the Secretary of the Treasury way too much authority and is written in a way to make it more difficult to understand.

Sec 136 increases FDIC insurance to $250,000 until Dec. 31st, 2009.
I find that odd. It hasn't kept up with inflation, so increasing the limit would make sense, especially since rich people pulling the amount in excess of $100,000 out of their accounts would hurt the banks further.

DIVISION B--ENERGY IMPROVEMENT AND EXTENSION ACT OF 2008 starts off by editing a lot of other laws, and extending some renewable energy credits
There is a credit allowed against the alternative minimum tax. Is it really a minimum tax then?

Extra credits for the steel industry?
FERC and state electric restructuring?

Subtitle B--Carbon Mitigation and Coal Provisions

(3) CAPTURE AND SEQUESTRATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS REQUIREMENT-
(A) IN GENERAL- Section 48A(e)(1) is amended by striking ‘and’ at the end of subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (F) and inserting ‘; and’, and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
‘(G) in the case of any project the application for which is submitted during the period described in subsection (d)(2)(A)(ii), the project includes equipment which separates and sequesters at least 65 percent (70 percent in the case of an application for reallocated credits under subsection (d)(4)) of such project’s total carbon dioxide emissions.’.
(B) HIGHEST PRIORITY FOR PROJECTS WHICH SEQUESTER CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS- Section 48A(e)(3) is amended by striking ‘and’ at the end of subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B)(iii) and inserting ‘, and’, and by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
‘(C) give highest priority to projects with the greatest separation and sequestration percentage of total carbon dioxide emissions.’.


SEC. 115. TAX CREDIT FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION.
    (a) In General- Subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 (relating to business credits) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
‘SEC. 45Q. CREDIT FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION.
‘(a) General Rule- For purposes of section 38, the carbon dioxide sequestration credit for any taxable year is an amount equal to the sum of--
    ‘(1) $20 per metric ton of qualified carbon dioxide which is--
      ‘(A) captured by the taxpayer at a qualified facility, and
      ‘(B) disposed of by the taxpayer in secure geological storage, and
    ‘(2) $10 per metric ton of qualified carbon dioxide which is--
      ‘(A) captured by the taxpayer at a qualified facility, and
      ‘(B) used by the taxpayer as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery project.

What the heck is this crap!? This bill was supposed to be about helping the economy!!! Why did they throw in limiting CO2 emissions and tax credits for those who do!
So much of this bill has nothing to do with it's advertised purpose!

TITLE III--ENERGY CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY PROVISIONS
Has credits for energy efficient appliances- that seems nice, but unrelated.

TITLE IV--REVENUE PROVISIONS
DIVISION C--TAX EXTENDERS AND ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF
SEC. 102. EXTENSION OF INCREASED ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX EXEMPTION AMOUNT.
SEC. 322. TAX INCENTIVES FOR INVESTMENT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.



Here's the bit about wool mentioned on The Daily Show

SEC. 325. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF DUTY SUSPENSION ON WOOL PRODUCTS; WOOL RESEARCH FUND; WOOL DUTY REFUNDS.
(a) Extension of Temporary Duty Reductions- Each of the following headings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘12/31/2014’:
    (1) Heading 9902.51.11 (relating to fabrics of worsted wool).
    (2) Heading 9902.51.13 (relating to yarn of combed wool).
    (3) Heading 9902.51.14 (relating to wool fiber, waste, garnetted stock, combed wool, or wool top).
    (4) Heading 9902.51.15 (relating to fabrics of combed wool).
    (5) Heading 9902.51.16 (relating to fabrics of combed wool).
(b) Extension of Duty Refunds and Wool Research Trust Fund-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 4002(c) of the Wool Suit and Textile Trade Extension Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-429; 118 Stat. 2603) is amended--
    (A) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ‘2010’ and inserting ‘2015’; and
    (B) in paragraph (6)(A), by striking ‘through 2009’ and inserting ‘through 2014’.
(2) SUNSET- Section 506(f) of the Trade and Development Act of 2000 (Public 106-200; 114 Stat. 303 (7 U.S.C. 7101 note)) is amended by striking ‘2010’ and inserting ‘2015’.



I found the bit about the wooden arrows!
SEC. 503. EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX FOR CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS DESIGNED FOR USE BY CHILDREN.
    (a) In General- Paragraph (2) of section 4161(b) is amended by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C) and by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new subparagraph:
        ‘(B) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN WOODEN ARROW SHAFTS- Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any shaft consisting of all natural wood with no laminations or artificial means of enhancing the spine of such shaft (whether sold separately or incorporated as part of a finished or unfinished product) of a type used in the manufacture of any arrow which after its assembly--
          ‘(i) measures 5/16 of an inch or less in diameter, and
          ‘(ii) is not suitable for use with a bow described in paragraph (1)(A).’.
    (b) Effective Date- The amendments made by this section shall apply to shafts first sold after the date of enactment of this Act.

Subtitle B--Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008
Again, why is this stuff just tacked on!?

TITLE VI--OTHER PROVISIONS
SEC. 601. SECURE RURAL SCHOOLS AND COMMUNITY SELF-DETERMINATION PROGRAM.
TITLE VII--DISASTER RELIEF
Subtitle A--Heartland and Hurricane Ike Disaster Relief

Did you know that disaster relief was part of the bailout bill? I didn't until reading this.



Ugh, each separate item should be a separate bill and voted on separately. In this case you have disaster relief mixed in with bailing out wall street and buying up bad debt, and all sorts of other stuff! Buying up the bad debt is not the way to go. Besides now they're asking for more!!!


Here's an idea, let's not vote for any incumbent who voted for this mess, even if they're not up for reelection this time around. When its their turn, kick them out. Please, look at the voting records and use that to make your decision. I know it takes more time to do, but we need to tell our government that they work for us! If they do a crappy job, they're fired!

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Ethanol Update

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/oct/03-anything-into-ethanol/article_view?b_start:int=0&-C=

Companies including Coskata and Range Fuels are moving ahead with making ethanol from wood chips. This is pretty exciting stuff as it is cost effective and a step towards energy independence!

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Police Violence at the Political Convetions

I am disgusted by the amount of violence that the police are committing against protesters, journalists, and bystanders in Denver and St. Paul. This kind of violence is inexcusable!

We, as citizens of the United States have certain rights guaranteed in the Constitution. They are there for a reason and specifically the First and Fourth Amendments need repeating:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The mainstream media has hardly touched this, focusing on Sarah Palin's parenting abilities. People need to know about this! This is violence going on here, in the United States, by the very people who are supposed to protect us.


In case you haven't heard, here are some examples:
video:
Raids Before the RNC
http://www.gather.com/viewVideo.jsp?id=11821949021870654
Police Raid in St. Paul
http://www.shadoweyes.com/content/police-raid-st-paul

Girl is Hit in the Face and Knocked to the Ground by a Police Officer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfISlq1gzK8
Reporter in Denver gets arrested for taking pictures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYxn56AKnqE
Nicole Salazar is Knocked Down and Dragged by Police
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jreRSEQ_yg

text:
Reporter talks about his experience of Being Arrested
http://nihilo0.blogspot.com/2008/07/be-prepared-for-police-violence-at-rnc.html
Girls are Arrested for Sidewalk Chalking
http://www.earnedmedia.org/cdc0828.htm
Another Police Raid on Protesters
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/30/rnc.protest/
St. Paul Police use bogus "hostage" claim
http://iwitnessvideo.info/blog/109.html

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Ethanol

Continuing my series on fuels other than the regular gasoline we pump into our cars is this look at ethanol.

So what is ethanol?
It is the same type of alcohol as in alcoholic beverages, but it also can be burned as fuel. It's molecular formula is written as C2H5OH or CH3-CH2-OH.

Was Henry Ford right when he called alcohol the "fuel of the future"? http://journeytoforever.org/ethanol.html

This how stuff works site describes the step by step process of how it's made.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/ethanol-facts.htm

Ethanol is one of the more attractive alternatives to gasoline simply because we can use it now - if you have a car that can use it and live near E85 stations.

It is not a new technology. Brazil started using ethanol, made from sugarcane, for fuel in the 1970s. "Today more than two-thirds of all cars sold run on ethanol and all Brazilian gasoline sold at the pumps contains 25 percent ethanol." from http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0505/p04s01-woam.html

Many Brazilians drive flex fuel vehicles than can run on gasoline or ethanol. When they fill up the tank, they have a choice, and most choose the home grown, less expensive ethanol. That sounds pretty nice.

Some people argue that using these food plants for fuel will mean there won't be enough food. Well, Brazil has an overproduction of sugar just like we have an overproduction of corn (much of that corn is not edible anyway). There are also some useful by products from making ethanol, such as CO2 which is sold for use in carbonated beverages or dry ice or maybe use in paintball guns. The left over plant proteins are fed to livestock, which is making use of a byproduct but not that great for the cows. Also, who says you have to make ethanol from food?

Ethanol can be made from cellulose. Range Fuels in Georgia was granted a permit to create the first cellulosic ethanol plant in America in July 2007. Cellulosic ethanol is pretty cool because not only are you using all of the plant, but its way more energy efficient than just using the sugar parts of the plant.

"Cellulosic ethanol can contain up to 16 times more energy than is required to create it! If that doesn't sound ridiculously impressive, consider that gasoline contains only 5 times more energy than was required to create it and corn ethanol is totally lame, containing only 1.3 times the energy required to create it." http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/798/
I'm not sure when this year, but they plan on making 100 million gallons of ethanol per year starting sometime in 2008.

So, summing up, here are some of the benefits of ethanol:
  • It is a cost effective alternative to gasoline.
  • It is a renewable energy source - from plants.
  • It provides high octane at a low cost.
  • Ethanol blends can and are being used without modifications to car engines - most gas you buy now is 10% ethanol.
  • Ethanol's high oxygen content reduces carbon monoxide emissions, and its the carbon monoxide (CO) that is the really deadly stuff.
  • If you care about CO2 emissions - ethanol reduces that too.
One downside is that you'll get a little less miles per gallon, but with the price difference between ethanol and gasoline, it's still worth it.

Much Ado About Nothing

In my internet browsing I found this article.

http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/largest-cleantech-industry-is%e2%80%a6carbon-credits-at-63-billion/

"Carbon credits were worth a staggering $63 billion in 2007 and $59 billion in the first half of 2008 alone." (Sarah Lozanova)


Carbon credits are a bigger industry than either solar or wind power. There is something wrong with this picture. How can the biggest clean technology not actually be a technology!?

Now I'm for reducing pollution, but I don't know how many times I need to say this. Carbon dioxide is not pollution. To all those who think it is, remember this: when you breath, you make carbon dioxide.

I just don't understand why people would buy carbon credits. Is it because they feel bad about making carbon dioxide? Where does that $63 billion go?

Why are they called carbon credits instead of carbon dioxide credits? If anyone has chunks of carbon just sitting around that they feel bad about, I would be happy to take them off your hand for a small "carbon credit" fee. I'm sure I could find a use for all that coal and diamonds.

Maybe I should make up a problem and charge people money for it. Anyone want to buy some Nitrogen credits? Everyday, you are breathing in and out way more nitrogen than carbon dioxide! If you think the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is alarming, than you should be even more alarmed at the amount of Nitrogen.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Congress and Bush Ignore the Constitution

There wasn't much press about this. I heard about it at the last minute.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_go_co/terrorist_surveillance

Retroactive immunity was given to telecom companies today, ignoring the fourth amendment of the constitution. Congress and the President all take an oath to uphold the constitution. The fact that they are passing laws that blatantly go against it makes me sick!


Here is the 4th Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


So, to spy on someone, you need a warrant and probable cause, and you need to describe the person or place you want to search.

The old FISA law gave the FBI a lot of leeway and made those warrants really easy to get. This new law goes way beyond that.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/washington/10fisa.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Obama voted for this mess! What happened to the plan to filibuster? http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/blogtalk-obamas-fisa-vote/

McCain was out of town and didn't bother to vote.


See the rest of the Bill of Rights here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html

A Note About Speculation

If you define a bubble as a faster than exponential increase in price, then we have an oil price bubble right now.


http://www.physorg.com/news134646313.html